* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DECIDED ON : 29th January, 2015
+ CRL.REV.P. 106/2014 & Crl.M.A.Nos.2841/2014 and 8307/2014
MOHAMMAD AMAJAD
..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Sharad Pandey, Advocate.
versus
SARAH AMAJAD @ SONIA DHIR
..... Respondent
Through : Mr.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.GARG, J. (ORAL)
Crl.M.A.2842/2014 (delay) Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection for condonation of delay. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the 80 days delay in filing the revision petition is condoned.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.REV.P. 106/2014 & Crl.M.A.Nos.2841/2014 and 8307/2014
1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-Mohammad Amajad to impugn the order dated 02.03.2013 passed by the Judge-02, Family Courts, Saket under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Crl.Rev.P.106/2014 Page 1 of 3 by which interim maintenance @ `7,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application was granted to the respondent-wife. The petition is contested by the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner is unable to pay the huge amount of `7,000/- per month as he has an annual income of `2 lacs being a butcher by profession. He is to maintain eight other family members dependent upon him. These assertions are controv