Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Mohammad Aslam vs Gulista on 29 January, 2015

$
0
0
till disposal of the petition was awarded to the respondent-wife.

Crl.Rev.691/2014 Page 1 of 3

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner has a monthly income of `5,000/- and is unable to pay the unreasonable amount granted to the respondent as interim maintenance. The petitioner is a labourer by profession.

3. I have examined the file. The petitioner has claimed himself to be a carpenter by profession. It is not expected that being a skilled worker, he would earn only `5,000/- in a month. Apparently, he has not revealed his true income. Reliance has been placed on settlement arrived at before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts on 17.01.2013. Even as per this settlement, the petitioner


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles