$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on : 27.10.2014 + W.P.(C) 6137/2013, C.M. NO.13514/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Standing Counsel, GNCTD. versus SHRI ANIL KUMAR VERMA ..... Respondent
Through: Respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) %
1. The Union of India (UOI) claims to be aggrieved by two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 21.08.2012, in O.A. No. 3715/2011 (hereafter referred to as the "main order") and the order in review proceeding - R.A. No. 59/2013 dated 29.04.2013 (hereafter referred to as the "review order"). The issue concerns the pay fixation of the respondent (hereafter referred to as "the applicant"), who was initially recruited as Head Constable/AWO in the Communications Wing of the Delhi Police.
2. The brief facts are that the applicant was appointed as Constable (Exe) in the pay scale `3050-4590/- on 23.02.1998. He thereafter W.P.(C) 6137/2013 Page 1 successfully applied and was inducted as a direct recruit Head Constable/AWO in the pay scale `3200-4900/-. The CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 were framed on 29.08.2008; they sought to effectuate the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission report. The applicant as on 01.01.2006 was drawing basic salary of ` 3795/- per month and in ter