Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

State vs Naresh & Ors on 10 February, 2014

$
0
0

: REVA KHETRAPAL, J.

CRL. L.P. NO.367/2012

1. Leave granted.

2. Registry shall register and number the Appeal.

Crl. A. No._______/2013

1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 17.12.2011 in Sessions Case No.82A/2011 acquitting the Respondents Naresh, Suresh, Nirmala, Niyadher Singh and Harnandi for the offences punishable under

CRL. L.P. NO.367/2012 Page 1 of 19 Section 498A IPC and 304B read with Section 34 IPC. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment, the State has preferred the present Appeal.

2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to the Appeal are that on 28.5.2005, on receipt of DD No.14A, ASI Ishwar Dutt (PW11) reached All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) where the deceased (Hema) was admitted and was being given treatment. The deceased was declared unfit for statement by the doctors.

3. On 30.5.2005 at 2.35 pm, information of the death of Hema was received in PS Sarojini Nagar and the sa


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles