+ CRL.A. 64/2006
SARLA
..... Appellant
Through Mr. Sumit Verma, Adv.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through Mr. Navin K. Jha, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
The appellant before this Court is Sarla. She has been convicted under Sections 363, 366-A and Section 376 read with Section 120-B of the IPC. She had been charged under Section 376 (g) of the IPC but had been acquitted of the said charge. For the offence under Section 366 of the IPC, she had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 15 days. For the offence under Section 366-A of the IPC, she had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 2- ½ years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI Crl. Appeal No.64/2006 Page 1 of 22 for 15 days. For the offence under Section 376 read with Section 120-B of the IPC, she was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 15 days.
The husband of the appellant Dhan Bahadur was also an accused in the present FIR; however, since he was absconding and could not be traced, he had been declared a proclaimed offender on 24.04.2004.