Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Rahul vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 12 July, 2013

$
0
0
Delhi High Court
Rahul vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Anr on 12 July, 2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of decision: July 12, 2013

+ W.P.(C) 6688/2012

RAHUL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Anil Singhal, Advocate

versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anjum Javed, Advocate with

Mr.Mirza Amir Baig, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. We are concerned with twelve out of twenty one posts of Sub Inspector (Ministerial) which were required to be filled up from amongst the General category departmental candidates.

2. The undisputed fact is that when the select list was drawn up, in order of merit, the candidate at serial No.12 listed was the one who had obtained 152 marks and the petitioner was the senior most departmental candidate few of whom had obtained 151 marks and if there was a thirteenth vacancy available he would have been empanelled.

3. The twelve empanelled candidates joined an thus the select list stood exhausted. After three months a candidate named Swatanter Yadav resigned which was accepted within six months of the panel being drawn up and he left.

WP(C) 6688/2012 Page 1 of 7

4. The petitioner raised an issue by filing OA No.1201/2010 stating that since vacancy resulting on resignation of Swatanter Yadav arose withi


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles