$~18
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: January 22, 2014 + RFA(OS) 21/2014 SMT SATYA KHURANA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Vinay Garg, Advocate with Mr.L.S.Solanki, Advocate
versus
SAMINDER SINGH REEN ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Kamlesh Mahajan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)
Caveat No.68/2014
Since the counsel as above appears for the respondent/caveator, the caveat stands discharged.
CM No.1298/2014
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 376 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application stands disposed of.
CM No.1299/2014
Allowed subject to just exceptions.
RFA (OS) No.21/2014
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Record of the suit which has been sent along with the appeal has been considered.
RFA (OS) No.21/2014 Page 1 of 5
2. The appellant has suffered an ex-parte decree on September 26, 2012.
3. The respondent/plaintiff proved at the trial that he purchased the non- judicial e-stamp papers Ex.PW-1/3 on November 25, 2011 by paying stamp duty in sum of `1,68,000/- (Rupees One Lac and Sixty Eight Thousand only) for purchasing property No.80/65-A, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi. He has also proved the sale deed Ex.PW-1/2