V.K.JAIN, J. (Oral)
Though this appeal purports to have been filed by two appellants namely Raju and Pardeep, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant states that in fact the appeal has been filed only by appellant Raju and the Vakalatnama filed along with the appeal has also been executed only by him. Accordingly, this has been considered as an appeal filed only by appellant Raju.
1. On 26.02.2008, at about 11.38 PM, the Police Control Room was informed by a person that three persons had committed robbery of a mobile phone, purse, ring and cash amounting to Rs 450/- from the informant and the robbers had run towards Kushak Road. The aforesaid information when given to the Police Station Swaroop Nagar by the Police Control Room was recorded there vide DD No. 20A, which was
Crl. Appeal No.49/2013 Page 1 of 8 given to SI Ravinder Singh for investigation. Constable Anand No. 631/OD, who was on patrol, was also informed and directed to reach the spot.
2. The case of the prosecution, as set out in the chargesheet, is that when the Investigating Officer reached the spot, Constable Anand and the complainan