Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Icici Bank Ltd. vs Astha Kumar & Anr. on 6 November, 2015

$
0
0

ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE:

For the Appellant: Mr Punit K. Bhalla & Ms Chetna Bhalla, Advocates For the Respondent: None.

CORAM :-

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

1. This is an appeal against the judgement and decree passed by the learned ADJ-II Central/ Delhi, dated 16.04.2015. The learned ADJ by virtue of the impugned judgement and decree has returned the plaint. 1.1 The appellant (i.e. the plaintiff in the suit), being aggrieved, has moved this court by way of the instant appeal.

2. The brief facts, which one is required to note, in order to adjudicate upon this appeal are as follows:

2.1 It is the case of the appellant that it had extended a loan to the respondents herein (i.e. the defendants), for purchase of a vehicle. The agreement arrived at in this regard was translated into a loan agreement/ a credit facility application form dated 20.01.2012 (hereafter referred to as the loan agreement). Along with the loan agreement, two sets of documents FAO 214/2015 Page 1 of 17 were also executed, firstly, an unattested deed of hypothecation; and secondly, an irrevocable power of attorney (collectively referred to as documents). The said documents were also executed on the same date i.e. 20.01.2012.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles