Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Uoi & Ors vs Sansar Chand on 27 August, 2013

$
0
0
Reserved on: August 07, 2013 Judgment Delivered on: August 27, 2013

+ W.P.(C) 8510/2011

UOI & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Katyal, Advocate

versus

SANSAR CHAND .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Raunak Jain, Advocate

W.P.(C) 5826/2012

UOI & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Katyal, Advocate

versus

MANGAL SINGH RAWAT & ANR. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Raunak Jain, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts leading to filing of the above captioned petitions are that respondents in both the petitions namely; Sansar Chand, Mangal Singh Rawat and Jeevan Lal; were appointed in Special Security Bureau (hereinafter referred to as the SSB) on the posts of Constable in the General Duty cadre.

W.P.(C) Nos.8510/2011 & 5826/2012 Page 1 of 14

2. There was a Homeopathy cadre in SSB. As per SSB (Homeopathy) Service Rules, 1992, the hierarchical structure of the Homeopathy cadre was as follows: - <- Senior Medical Officer (Homeopathy) <- Medical Officer (Ho


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles