* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DECIDED ON : 26th August, 2013
+ CRL.M.C. 1078/2013
MADAN LAL SURYAWANSHI ..... Petitioner
Through : Petitioner in person.
versus
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.GARG, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition impugning order dated 10.05.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby his revision petition being C.R.No.69/12 challenging dismissal order dated 10.10.2011 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C was dismissed.
2. I have heard the petitioner and have examined the trial court record. Only grievance of the petitioner is that the trial court did not direct the police to investigate his complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. His plea is that the matter requires investigation through police as he is unable to collect and produce the evidence. The complaint case filed by him discloses commission of cognizable offences by the respondents.
CRL.M.C.1078/2013 Page 1 of 7
3. The petitioner filed a complaint case against six police officials, two private persons and three unknown persons for committing various offences before the trial court on 5th April, 2011. Vide order dated 10th October, 2011, the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C was dismissed. The complainant was directed to prove his case by producing evidence and the case was adjourned for recording statements of the witnesses for 26th A