M.P.Nauriyal vs Delhi Development Authority on 10 March, 2015

delivered on: March 10, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8045/2012 M.P.NAURIYAL ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner has inter alia prayed as under:-

           "a)      A Writ of Certiorari calling for the
           records of the case for perusal;

           b)        A Writ of Certiorari quashing the action

of the respondent in not including the name of the petitioner in the draw held in February 2008 alongwith his contemporaries and then refusing to allot him a flat I the same area at the same cost, as a missing priority case, being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of the Rules, Regulations, Policy and the principles of equity, justice and good conscience;

WP(C) No. 8045/2012 Page 1 of 21

c) A writ of Mandamus commanding the respondent to immediately allot to the petitioner an LIG Flat, in the same area where his contemporaries were allotted flats in the tail-end priority draw of LIG Flats in February 2008 and his name was missed out/not included therein, by holding a mini draw and issue him the demand