delivered on: 10.03.2015
+ W.P.(C) 1041/2013
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL ..... Petitioner
versus
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF INDIA ..... Respondent
AND
+ W.P.(C) 1665/2013
R.K. JAIN ..... Petitioner
versus
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr Pranav Sachdeva and Mr Syed Musaib
in W.P.(C) 1041/2013.
Mr Rajveer Singh and Mr J.K. Mittal in
W.P.(C) 1665/2013.
For the Respondents : Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Ms Kritika
Mehra for UOI in W.P.(C) 1041/2013.
Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI in
W.P.(C) 1665/2013.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
JUDGMENT
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
1. The point in issue in these petitions, is whether the Office of Attorney General of India is a 'public authority' within the meaning of section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the 'RTI Act')?
W.P.(C) 1041/2013 & 1665/2013 Page 1 of 132. The petitioners impugn an order dated 10.12.2012 (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned order') passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter 'the CIC') holding that the office of Attorney General of