$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision : February 18, 2015
+ W.P.(C) 1031/2014
NAROTTAM KUMAR JHA ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr.Virender Singh Kadian, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Represented by: Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (ORAL)
1. There is a multiplicity of causes of action merged in the writ petition. The petitioner is seeking quashing of the order compulsorily retiring him in exercise of the power of the respondent under FR 56(j). He is also claiming ACP benefits. He is also claiming updation of the leave record. He is also claiming disability pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition may be restricted to the order compulsorily retiring the petitioner and thus it may be observed that on other issues the writ petitioner would be at liberty to file fresh writ petitions.
3. Granting liberty to the petitioner as prayed for, we restrict consideration to the order by which the petitioner has been compulsorily retired from service.
4. Relevant record has been produced and would evince that the Appraisal Committee to consider continuation of service of the petitioner W.P.(C) No.1031/2014 Page 1 of 3 has noted that the petitioner was appointed as a Constable in the CISF on June 11, 1973. In the year 2007 a major penal