* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 286/2015 % 13th January, 2015 SANTOSH SINDAL ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Adv. and Mr. Naresh Kr. Sharma, VERSUS SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF DAYA NAND SCHOOL & ANR. ...... Respondents
Through: Mr. Yogesh Saini and Mr. Kartik Jindal, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, who was a teacher with the respondent no.1-school, impugns the order of the Delhi School Tribunal dated 11.11.2014 which has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner in which the petitioner had challenged the order of the school dated 31.7.2013 terminating her services.
2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was employed as a part-time Yoga teacher in the respondent no.1-school on 6.7.2000 and she WPC 286/2015 Page 1 of 6 was thereafter engaged as a full time Yoga teacher w.e.f 25.9.2004. Respondent no1-school abolished the post in question on account of financial stringency and in view of the fact that teaching of Yoga was not a prescribed subject under the CBSE syllabus. On account of abolition of the post, the services of the petition