Singh Raj vs State & Ors. on 19 November, 2014

$~5
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                  Date of Decision: November 19, 2014
+                                  CRL.A. 50/2014
         SINGH RAJ                                           ..... Appellant
                       Represented by:     Mr.Dinkar Verma, Advocate
                                           versus
         STATE & ORS                                         ..... Respondents
                  Represented by:          Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP
                                           Insp.Raman, SHO/PS Mehraulli
                                           SI Bijender Singh
                                           Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-
                                           2 and R-3
                                           Mr.Sushil Kumar Jain, Advocate for
                                           R-4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)

Crl.M.A.No.50/2014 For the reasons stated in the application the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

The application is disposed of.

Crl.A.No.50/2014

1. Complainant is the appellant and his grievance is that respondents 2 to 4 have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326/34 IPC. He desires that the respondents should be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant urges that the impugned order dated January 21, 2013 would show that the learned Trial Judge was influenced by the fact that a compromise had taken place between the complainant and the Crl.A.No.50/2014