$~R-40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: July 30, 2013
+ W.P.(C) 7516/2001
MRS.NIRMAL GUPTA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.K.P.Gupta, Advocate
versus
THE LT.GOVERNOR/ADMINISTRATOR
GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)
1. The issue at hand is short. A select panel for appointment to the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) was prepared in the year 1984 and some appointments were made. Without exhausting the panel another advertisement was issued inviting applications from eligible candidates and at that stage the empanelled candidates who had not been offered appointment approached the Tribunal vide OA No.842/1991 which was disposed of with a direction that all empanelled candidates be offered appointments, with a determinative finding that vacancies existed in the year 1984 for the post of PGT and that the vacancies could not be carry forward. The decision of the Tribunal was challenged before the Supreme Court with no success by the department. The result was that the empanelled candidates were given appointment, but in batches; and in the interregnum large number of persons were appointed as PGT. W.P.(C) 7516/2001 Page 1 of 5
2. Similar was the position with respect to the panel for the post of TGT. Challenge