Mohit Bansal vs State N.C.T. Of Delhi on 12 November, 2014

reserved on : 30.10.2014 Judgment delivered on : 12.11.2014 + Crl. M.A. No.1117/2014 in Crl. Appeal No.828/2009 MOHIT BANSAL ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Bharat Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Navin K. Jha, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1 This is an application filed under Sections 4 & 6 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) seeking probation in terms of the conviction which has been upheld against the applicant by a Bench of this Court.

2 The averments contained in the application have been perused. It Crl. M.A. No.1117/2014 in Crl. Appeal No.828/2009 Page 1 of 8 is stated that the applicant is enrolled as a chartered accountant with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. He had been convicted by the Sessions Judge under Section 376 (2)(g) as also under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

3 His appeal before a bench of this Court was disposed of on 07.10.2013. His conviction under Section 376 (2)(g) had been set aside and instead he had been convicted under Section 354 of the IPC; his c