Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Mohd Majid vs State on 16 October, 2014

$
0
0
Reserved on: October 13, 2014 % Judgment Delivered on: October 16, 2014 + CRL.A.528/2014 MOHD MAJID ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. AND + CRL.A.686/2014 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Suman Arora, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. Mohd.Majid and Raj Kumar are convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 364A/34 IPC for the kidnapping of Deepak Singhal and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each and in default of payment for fine to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months. Besides the appellants two more accused were involved i.e. Sagar and Yusuf who were declared proclaimed offenders and are thus not Crl.A.Nos.528 of 2014 and 686 of 2014


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles