* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 10.09.2014 Pronounced on: 14.10.2014 + W.P.(C) 7025/2010 SMT. KUSUM LATA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. A.K. Trivedi, Sh. Rajeev Manglik and Sh. Sameer Sharma, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Sh. Saqib, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % C.M. NO.15789/2013 (for early hearing) For the reasons mentioned in the application, C.M. No.15789/2013 is allowed.
W.P.(C) 7025/2010
1. The petitioner in these proceedings - under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks directions to quash the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) - dated 07.09.2006 in O.A. No.1705/2006 (hereafter called "the main order"); the order dated 30.06.2008 in R.A. No.88/2008 (hereafter called "the review order") and the order dated 22.09.2009 in M.A. No.1635/2009 (hereafter called "the recall order"). The CAT had denied her claim for ante- dated promotion as Superintendent (Legal) with effect from 09.05.2000, when she was promoted on ad hoc basis to that post.
W.P.(C) 7025/2010 Page 1
2. The brief facts are that the cadre of Superintendent (Legal) comprises a sanctioned strength of 18, of which 1/3rd (6 posts) are earmarked