% Judgment Delivered on: September 04, 2014
+ CRL.A. 912/2013
DHANANAJAY KUMAR @ PYARE LAL ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Chetan Anand, Advocate
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
1. Dhananjay Kumar is convicted of the offence of murder of his wife Chanchal whom he married 7-8 months prior to the incident by the impugned judgment dated March 19, 2013 and by the order on sentence dated March 23, 2013 he has been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of ` 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for two years.
2. Dhananjay Kumar assails the judgment on the ground that there is no eye-witness to the incident. All the witnesses are interested witnesses and relations of the deceased. There are material contradictions in the testimony of the witnesses. The FSL report does not implicate Dhananjay Kumar. The defence of the appellant that he was sleeping at his place and was informed by Munna that his wife has been murdered has not been considered.
Crl.A.No. 912/2013 Page 1 of 9 Dhananjay Kumar never doubted that his wife was having illicit relations with Munna. Dharmender PW6 on whose statement FIR has been regi