* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.No.89/2012 & C.M.No.3393/2012 (stay) % 02st September, 2014 SH. ARUN KUMAR SHARMA ......Petitioner Through: Mr.Alok Kumar with Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Mr.Amit Kumar Singh and Mr.Rishabh
Mehta, Advocates.
VERSUS
PAWAN GUPTA ...... Respondent Through: Mr.Alok Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner/tenant under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 'the Act') impugning the order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 17.1.2012 which has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the tenanted premises being one shop on the ground floor of RC.REV.No.89/2012 Page 1 of 4 property no. IX/17 (Part) admeasuring 60 sq. yards in khasra no.331/36, 37, Kailash Nagar, Village Seelampur, Illaqa Shahdara, Delhi-31.
2. The respondent/landlord filed the bonafide necessity petition stating that the respondent/landlord carries on his seasonal business of selling festival items during Rakshabandhan, Holi, Diwali etc from the foot path of Sadar Bazar, and therefore he n