* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: August 06, 2014
+ CRL.A. 45/2014
CHAND RAM ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate
versus
STATE & ORS. .... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Lovekesh Sawhney, APP with
Insp. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, SI
Premveer PS Sultanpuri.
Mr. R.K. Uppal, Adv. for R-2 to 4.
Mr. K.K. Pradhan, Adv. for R-5.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
MUKTA GUPTA, J. (Oral)
1. The appellant an injured victim and maker of FIR No. 419/2009 challenges the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge dated November 11, 2013 whereby respondents No.2 to 5 have been acquitted of the charges framed under Sections 307/34, 452/34 & 506/34 IPC. Respondent No.2 has been convicted for offence under Section 325 IPC and released on probation with a compensation of `40,000/- to be paid to the appellant.
2. The grievance of the appellant is that for the incident which occurred on December 07, 2008 the Police did not register any FIR and only when he filed an application under Section 156 Cr.P.C. before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, FIR No. 419/2009 was registered under Sections
Crl.A.No.45/2014 Page 1 of 6 323/452/34 IPC. On a charge-