* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 14.07.2014
Pronounced on: 23.07.2014
+ W.P.(C) 2216/2014
MAHABIR PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. G.S. Charya, Advocate.
versus
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate..
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
%
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questions an order dated 23.03.2012 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter 'the Tribunal') in O.A. No.3579/2011 and the order dated 12.05.2011 of the Delhi Transport Corporation (hereafter 'DTC') to the extent that it denies the petitioner notional fixation of pay and increments and counts the period out of employment as not being in service, for the purposes of pension and terminal benefits. The question requiring decision is whether an employee reinstated to his position is entitled to benefits of notional pay fixation, increments etc. and also additionally, if his services are to be counted for the
W.P.(C) 2216/2014 Page 1 purpose of pension and terminal benefits for the intervening period (between the date of termination order and the date of reinstatement).
2. The facts are that the petitioner is an employee of the DTC. He was removed from service by an order dated 19.01.1995 on