Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Natasha Kohli vs Kum Kum Talwar & Anr. on 21 July, 2014

$
0
0
Reserved on: 12.05.2014

% Judgment Pronounced on: 21.07.2014 + FAO(OS) 74 OF 2014

IN THE MATTER OF:

NATASHA KOHLI ... APPELLANT Through: Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr.

Advocate with Mr. Rajshekhar

Rao, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Ms.

Anu Bagai and Mr.Bhuvan Mishra,

Advocates

VERSUS

KUM KUM TALWAR & ANR. ... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satvik Verma, Mr. Ankur

Mahindroo and Mr. Apurv Ranjan,

Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

G. ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE

1. The present appeal has been preferred under Order 43 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 against the Orders dated 20.12.2013, 10.01.2014 and 24.01.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in I.A. No.20865/2013, I.A. No.530/2014 and R.A. No.18/2014 respectively in CS (OS) No. 1576/2013.

FAO(OS) 74/2014 Page 1 of 13

2. The appellant herein is the defendant in the Suit. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall hereinafter be referred to as the defendant and the respondents as plaintiffs.

3.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles