* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RSA No.148/2014
% 30th May, 2014
SMT. SAROJ ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ankit, Advocate
Versus
SMT. KUSUM DEVI ..... Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
C.M.No.9954/2014
1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 26 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions.
2. C.M stands disposed of.
C.M.No.9953/2014
1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. C.M stands disposed of.
RSA No.148/2014 & C.M.No.9952/2014 (Stay)
1. This regular second appeal under Section 100 of CPC impugns the concurrent judgments of the Courts below; of the Trial Court dated 27.4.2013 and the First Appellate Court dated 21.2.2014; by which the suit of the appellant/plaintiff for partition/declaration/possession and injunction was dismissed.
2. The appellant/plaintiff claimed that she was the owner of the suit
RSA No. 148/2014 Page 1 of 3 property bearing no.79/6/1, village Nangloi Jat Colony as house no.RZC-50 (old no.RZB-11), Nangloi Jat Colony, New Delhi. She claimed to have purchased the property for a consideration of Rs.1,85,000/- from its lawful owner Udai Bir Singh. The appellant/plaintiff claimed th