$-R7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : 15th MAY, 2014
+ CRL.A.No. 201/2011 RAVINDER CHAUHAN ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pankaj Tripathi, Advocate along with appellant in person.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
S.P.Garg, J. (Open Court)
1. The appellant was convicted by a judgment dated 09.12.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 51/10 arising out of FIR No. 52/10 PS M.S.Park for committing offences under Sections 367/377 IPC. By an order dated 10.12.2010, the appellant was awarded RI for three years with fine ` 3,000/- under Section 367 IPC and RI for five years with fine ` 4,000/- under Section 377 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently.
Crl.A.No.201/2011 Page 1 of 2
2. Appellant's counsel on instructions has stated that the appellant has opted not to pursue the appeal as he has come out of the jail after completing the sentence awarded. To this, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has no objection.
3. Since the appellant has served the sentence awarded to him and has given up challenge to the findings of the Trial Court and opted not to pursue the appeal on merits, the appeal is dismissed as 'not pressed'. Trial Court record be sent back forthwith with the copy of th