+ MAC.APP. 40/2012
ANGAD KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate.
versus
GOPAL BAHADUR & ORS. ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
SURESH KAIT, J.: (ORAL)
1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 05.09.2011 whereby learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.7,37,563/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e. 01.05.2010 till realisation of the award amount.
2. Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of compensation as noted above.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that in the accident the appellant received injury with 80% disability and the learned Tribunal has assessed the disability as 60%. Age of the injured on
MAC.APP.No.40/2012 Page 1 of 6 the date of accident was 19 years, despite, the learned Tribunal has not added any amount in his actual income towards future prospects.
4. To strengthen the argument learned counsel has relied upon the case of Rajesh and Ors. Vs. Rajbir Singh and Ors. 2013 (6) SCALE 563 wherein it has been held as under: -
"11. Since, the Court in Santosh Devi's case (supra) actually intended to fo