Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Through: Mr. Rajesh Rai, Advocate vs Arun Guar And The Plaintiff Was ... on 31 March, 2014

$
0
0
Reserved on: 20 th February, 2014

Order Pronounced on: 31 st March, 2014

CS(OS) 632/2013

R AM B ABU G UPTA ..... P LAINTIFF Through: Mr. Rajesh Rai, Advocate

with Plaintiff in person.

versus

M/ S . A DITYA B IRLA G ROUP & ANOTHER .....D EFENDANTS Through: Mr. Navin Chawla, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs. 50,00,000/- as damages for illegal termination of employment, arrears of salary, etc. The suit ha d originally been filed only against M/s. Aditya Birla Group.

2. The contention of the Plaintiff is that the interview for ===================================================================== CS (OS) 632/2013 Page 1 of 15 the appointment of the Plaintiff was conducted by Mr. Arun Guar and the Plaintiff was appointed by the Defendant with a subsidiary company of the Defendant M/s. Liaoning Birla Carbon Co. Ltd. at China. As per the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was wrongfully terminated and accordingly suffered a loss. The Plaintiff thus filed the present suit.

3. The Defendant has not filed any written statement. The counsel


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles