Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Ponty Singh vs Anu Singh Bhatia on 12 March, 2014

$
0
0
Reserved on: January 21, 2014

% Judgment Delivered on: March 12, 2014

+ RFA(OS) 12/2014

PONTY SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and

Ms.Megha Katari, Advocates

versus

ANU SINGH BHATIA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.P.Banerjee,

Ms.Princy and Ms.Harleen Singh,

Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1. Vide impugned order dated January 06, 2014 the learned Single Judge has dismissed CS (OS) 820/2012 opining it to be infructuous for the reason in the suit filed by the appellant, in which his wife was a defendant, prayer made was to restrain the wife from initiating any proceedings against the appellant in Singapore. Before summons in the anti suit injunction filed by the appellant was served upon the respondent she had already initiated divorce proceedings in a Court at Singapore and had obtained a Mareva injunction freezing bank accounts of the appellant. The learned Single Judge noted that in spite of said fact being in the knowledge of the appellant he did not bother to amend the plaint to pray that his wife be restra


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles