Quantcast
Channel: Delhi High Court
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Dr.Satish Kumar vs Shiv Kumar & Anr on 25 February, 2014

$
0
0
Delhi High Court
Dr.Satish Kumar vs Shiv Kumar & Anr on 25 February, 2014

$~2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of Decision: February 25, 2014

+ RFA (OS) 154/2013

DR.SATISH KUMAR .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.S.Jain, Advocate with Ms.Veena Rupara, Mr.Nikesh Jain

and Ms.Himani Gupta, Advocates

versus

SHIV KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Represented by: None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)

CM No.19350/2013

Allowed subject to just exceptions.

CM No.19352/2013

For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 49 days in re- filing the appeal is condoned.

CM No.19351/2013

For the reasons stated in the application time is extended for filing the court fee in appeal till when it was filed on November 25, 2013. RFA (OS) No.154/2013

1. The cacophony in paragraph 2 of the plaint, wherein it is pleaded that Sh.Jiya Lal S/o Sh.Neki Ram is the grandfather as well as the adoptive father of the appellant - the plaintiff, becomes audible music

RFA (OS) No.154/2013 Page 1 of 4 after grappling and jostling with learned counsel for the appellant in Court for 20 minutes, as we understand that Late Sh.Neki Ram was blessed with three sons named : (i) Subhash Chander, (ii) Jiya Lal, and (iii) Laxmi Narayan. The appellant is the son of Hukam Chander who was born to Laxmi Naray


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13123

Trending Articles