V.K.JAIN, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner before this Court is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. Vide order dated 30.4.2013 issued by the Director to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Foreigners Division (FCRA Wing), the permanent registration of the petitioner association was suspended in exercise of the powers conferred upon the Central Government under Section 13 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010. While suspending the said registration, it was also directed that the petitioner association can utilize the funds available with it, only after taking prior permission of the Central Government in terms of Section 13(2)(b) of the FARA, 2010.

W.P.(C) No.4982/2013 Page 1 of

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of decision: 19th September, 2013 + CS(OS) 2969/2011

NIRANJAN LAL GUPTA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

Dinesh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Sonu

Gupta, Advocates.

Versus

GURMEET SINGH BAWEJA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ajay Burman, Mr. Karan Burman

and Mr. Aditya Shankar, Advocates

for D-1.

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. T. Singhdev

and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Advocates

for D-3.

Mr. Madan Bhatia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.

P.S. Bindra and Ms. Sweta

Priyadarshini, Advocates for D-4 & 5.

CORAM :-

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The two plaintiffs have instituted this suit (i) for declaration of the election on 24th November, 2011 of defendant no.4 Mr. Bal Malkit Singh and defendant no.5 Mr. Kultaran Singh Atwal to the post of President and Vice President (North Zone) respectively of the defendant no.3 All India Motor Transport Congress for the term 2011-2013 as illegal, null & void; (ii) CS(OS) No.2969/2011 Page 1 of 24 for mandatory injunction directing the defendant no.1 Election Officer to re- count the votes takin

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Date of decision: 11th November, 2013 + ARB.P. 236/2012

VIOM NETWORK LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms.

Anuradha Mukherjee & Mr. Abhijit

Mittal, Advs.

Versus

S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam

Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms.

Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon &

Mr. S. Rana, Advs.

AND

+ ARB.P. 9/2013 BHARTI INFRATEL LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Omar Ahmad & Mr. Manu, Advs.

Versus

S TEL PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan with Mr. Gautam Narayan, Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms.

Asmita Singh, Mr. Nikhil Menon &

Mr. S. Rana, Advs.

AND

+

MANMOHAN, J:

Crl.M.A. No.14336/2013 (exemption) in W.P.(CRL.) 1546/2013 Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(CRL.) 1546/2013 & Crl.M.A. No.14335/2013

1. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-

W.P.(CRL.) 1546/2013 Page 1 of 17 "(i) Issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other writ, order or direction of similar nature declaring and quashing the provisions of Section 2(u), 3, 4, 5, 8, 24 & 45 of the PMLA as being ultra vires the Constitution.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 8th October, 2013

DECIDED ON : 12th November, 2013

+ CRL.A. 412/2003

RAJESH @ JANGALI

..... Appellant

Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with

appellant present in person.

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP.

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred by Rajesh @ Jangali to challenge a judgment dated 13.05.2003 whereby in case FIR No.36/2002 registered at Police Station Kalkaji, he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with fine.

2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 07.01.2002 at about 07.30 P.M. after committing criminal trespass in Jhuggi No.C-149, Crl.A.No.412/2003 Page 1 of 4 Dr. Ambadkar Camp, Nehru Place, he inflicted injuries to Rohtash with a churi in an attempt to murder him. The prosecution examined nine witnesses to prove the charges. In 313 statement, the appellant pleaded innocence and examined four witnesses in defence. The Trial Court after considering the rival contentions of the parties and evidence of the prosecution held him guilty under Section 307 IPC.

3. During the course of arguments, appellant's counsel, on instructions, stated

+ MAC.APP. 611/2013

SIMARJIT KAUR & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Adv.

versus

RAM MURTI SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal is directed against the award dated 21st November, 2012 whereby learned Tribunal has awarded compensation for a sum of Rs.17,98,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition till realization.

2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants seek enhancement of the compensation award amount, as noted above.

3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued the sole ground that age of the deceased Baljinder Singh was 28 years on the date of accident, i.e. 23rd July, 2012, despite, that the learned Tribunal has added 30% towards future prospects.

MAC.APP.611/2013 Page 1 of 4

4. To strengthen his argument, counsel has relied upon the case of Rajesh versus Raj Bir Singh, 2013 (6) SCALE 563 decided on 12th April, 2013, the relevant para reads as under:-

"11. Since, the Court in Santosh Devi's case (supra) actually intended to follow the principle in the case of salaried persons as laid in Saria Verma's case (supra) and to make it applicable also

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: November 12, 2013

+ W.P.(C) 3381/2002

COMMANDER & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Derodya,

Advocate

versus

BHUPENDERA KARDEAM & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate

for R-1, R-2 and R-4 to R-6

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO

V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.

1. The writ petition lays a challenge to the order dated January 22, 2002 in Original Application No.303/2000, whereby the Tribunal allowed the Original Application filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 6 herein and set aside the selection of respondent Nos.7 to 13 as Mazdoors.

2. The brief facts are that 24 vacancies of Mazdoors were notified to the Sub Regional Employment Exchange, Kirby Place, Delhi Cant. by the petitioners. Simultaneously an advertisement to this effect was also released in 3 national dailies.

3. The required qualifications and age for the candidates was notified as 8th class pass and 18 to 25 years age with relaxation upto 30 years in case of scheduled caste/scheduled tribe candidates and 3 years

WP(C) 3381/2002 Page 1 of 12 relaxation in the case of OBC candidates as per recruitment rules and prevailing policy of the Government of India.

4. The Board was constituted by the pe

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

RESERVED ON : 3rd SEPTEMBER, 2013

DECIDED ON : 12th NOVEMBER, 2013

+ CRL.A. 230/2000

RAM PARSHAD ....Appellant Through : Mr. M.M.Singh, Advocate with Mr.Sunil Singh, Advocate.

versus

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J.

1. Ram Parshad (the appellant) challenges the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 08.03.2000 in Sessions Case No. 398/94 arising out of FIR No. 233/91 under Section 302 IPC registered at PS Gokal Puri by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 304 part-II IPC and awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 3,000/-. The factual matrix of the case are as under :

2. Meera, (Ram Roop's sister) married to Radhey Shyam, appellant's son, had come to stay at her parents' house on the occasion of delivery of a son to her sister-in-law (Devrani), Rustam's wife. On the day CRL.A. 230/2000 Page 1 of 11 of incident i.e. 25.07.1991, Radhey Shyam had come to her in-laws' house to bring her back and after some time, the appellant also came there. Meera's brother - Raj Kumar promised to send her back after some days as certain formalities regarding the birth of the child were yet to be performed. Ram Parshad confronted Raj Kumar for not sending Meera with his son - Radhey Shyam and hit him (Raj Ku

+ WP(C) No.9957 of 2009 & CM No.8242 of 2009

ANANDPUR DHAM KALYAN SAMITI (REGD.) ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv. With Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advs.

Versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan and Ms. Jahnavi

Upadhyay, Advs. For R-1 - Govt. of

NCT of Delhi

Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr. Kunal Kohli

and Mr. Vikas Sood, Advs. For DSIDC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN

JUDGMENT

V.K.JAIN, J.

The petitioner before this Court is a registered society and claims to represent the residents of Anandpur Dham, an unauthorized colony being considered for regularization. According to the petitioner, the aforesaid colony has come up on an agricultural land of Village Karala. The Government of India prepared guidelines for regularization of unauthorized colonies and submitted the same to this Court on 20.2.2001 in CWP No.4771/1993, Common Cause versus Union of India and others. The aforesaid writ petition came to be disposed of vide order dated 27.2.2001 with directions to the Union of India to notify

W.P.(C) No.9957/2009 Page 1 of 14 colonies, which according to it were to be regularized and which could not be regularized in terms o

V.K.JAIN, J. (Oral)

The petitioner before this Court appeared in Class-I Medical Test at Air Force Medical Centre, Subroto Park, New Delhi for issuance of license and was declared temporarily unfit. The limitations found during the medical examination of the petitioner was EEG abnormality and complete RBB Bon EEG(R). He was advised next review with MRI brain, 2D Echocardiography, Doppler study and opinion of Neuro physician on EEG abnormality. The petitioner was again medically examined on 6.2.2007 and was found fit. On 6.2.2007, AFCME issued initial Class-I fit medical certificate to the petitioner. The respondent, however, replying upon the EEG report declared the petitioner permanently unfit for flying vide order dated 16.8.2007. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the above assessm

MANMOHAN, J: (Oral)

CM APPL. 17867/2013 in LPA 849/2013

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

LPA 849/2013 Page 1 of 5 LPA 849/2013 & CM APPL. 17868/2013

1. Present letters patent appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 21st October, 2013 passed by learned Single Judge whereby writ petition of appellants seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1- University t

MANMOHAN, J: (Oral)

1. Present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 03rd December, 2012 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 8965/2007 whereby the writ petition filed by twenty-one villagers of village Mundka, Delhi, challenging the order of Settlement Officer (Consolidation) dated 04th April, 1983 directing shifting of cremation ground to a new location at the outskirts of extended Lal Dora of the said village was dismissed.

2. The learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has observed as under:-

LPA 68/2013 Page 1 of 6 "9. Upon indepth consideration of the submissions of respective parties and on perusal of material on record, this Court finds that Settlement Officer's order of 4th April, 1983, which is based upon Financial Commissioner's order of 8th October, 1982 has attained finality and operates as res-judicata. It needs no reiteration that an

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 22.10.2013

% Date of Decision: 13.11.2013 + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.8372 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.2812 of 2012

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

W.P.(C) No.4478 of 2011 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.3431 of 2013

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Thr

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 22.10.2013

% Date of Decision: 13.11.2013 + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.8372 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.2812 of 2012

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

W.P.(C) No.4478 of 2011 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.3431 of 2013

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Thr

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 22.10.2013

% Date of Decision: 13.11.2013 + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.8372 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.2812 of 2012

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

W.P.(C) No.4478 of 2011 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.3431 of 2013

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Thr

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 22.10.2013

% Date of Decision: 13.11.2013 + WP (C) No.4478 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.8372 of 2011

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.2812 of 2012

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Adv.

Versus

W.P.(C) No.4478 of 2011 & connected matters Page 1 of 13 ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1.

+ WP (C) No.3431 of 2013

MARUT NANDAN

EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. .... Petitioners Thr

% Order delivered on: 13.11.2013

+ CS(OS) 2149/2013 & I.A. 17827-17828/2013

RAJIV KHOSLA ..... Plaintiff Through: Plaintiff in person.

versus

DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS..... Defendants Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

ORDER

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

I.A. No.17827/2013 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The plaintiff is granted four weeks time to file better copies of dim documents and to file the original documents in his power and possession. Application stands disposed of.

C.S. (OS) No.2149/2013

Issue summons in the suit to the defendants returnable on 15.01.2014 before the joint registrar by ordinary process, registered AD speed post and authorised courier, to be listed along with C.S. (OS) No.2111/2013 titled "Delhi Bar Association & Ors. V. Delhi High Court Bar Association & Anr."

CS(OS) 2149/2013 Page 1 of 25 I.A. No.17828/2013

1. Issue notice to the defendants returnable on 15.01.2014 before the joint registrar by ordinary process, registered AD speed post and authorised courier.

2. I have heard detailed submissions of the plaintiff in person, who presses this application for grant of ex-parte ad interim orders of injunction. Since I am not inclined to pass ex parte ad interim orders of injunction, and detailed s

G. P. MITTAL J.

Crl.A. Nos.1327/2012, 1328/2012 & 1329/2012 Page 1 of 25

1. The

G. P. MITTAL J.

Crl.A. Nos.1327/2012, 1328/2012 & 1329/2012 Page 1 of 25

1. The

G. P. MITTAL J.

Crl.A. Nos.1327/2012, 1328/2012 & 1329/2012 Page 1 of 25

1. The